Richard Hofstadter’s Brilliant Essay Misled Us About the.
Richard Hofstader has shown that there is quite a difference between intelligent and intellectual thinking. Most people do not often realize this. And sometimes, they do both blindly. Intelligent thinking only works within the given circumstances, while intellectual thinking steps outside t.
Social Darwinism in American Thought portrays the overall influence of Darwin on American social theory and the notable battle waged among thinkers over the implications of evolutionary theory for social thought and political action. Theorists such as Herbert Spencer and William Graham Sumner adopted the idea of the struggle for existence as justification for the evils as well as the benefits.
Richard Hofstadter, the distinguished historian and twice winner of the Pulitzer Prize, brilliantly assesses the ideas and contributions of the three major American interpretive historians of the twentieth century: Frederick Jackson Turner, Charles A. Beard and V.L. Parrington. These men, whose views of history were shaped in large part by the political battles of the Progressive era, provided.
Richard Hofstadter Wikipedia open wikipedia design. Richard Hofstadter. Hofstadter circa 1970. Born August 6, 1916. Buffalo, New York, US. Died: October 24, 1970 (aged 54) New York City, New York, US. Spouse(s) Felice Swados (m. 1936; died 1945) Beatrice Kevitt (m. 1947) Awards.
David Brown's biography of Richard Hofstadter has attracted an unusual amount of attention for a revised dissertation, riding the wave of nostalgia that surrounds the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian and liberal icon of the 1950s and '60s. At the New York Times Book Review, the book was the subject of the longest review of the year, and one of the most admiring, written by the editor himself.
Shortly after GEB’s smashing success, Hofstadter and philosopher Daniel Dennett “composed and arranged” and, in 1981, published The Mind’s I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul, a marvelous collection of essays and short fiction, each piece followed by a “reflection” by one of the editors. In some ways the structure of this book seems more standard, and perhaps less.
Brown acknowledges his special debt to Susan Baker’s Radical Beginnings: Richard Hofstadter and the 1930’s (1985), and he also utilized the historiographical essays by Paula Fass and Jack Pole.